I don’t like cigarettes.
In fact I think they should be banned.
Not a particularly groundbreaking statement – or is it?
What sort of world would it be if it were smoke-free? You would probably put many health professionals out of work, unclog the hospital system and save billions in health care.
But what will happen to literature?
There are a slew of authors past and present who have lit up – Kurt Vonnegut, George Orwell, Albert Camus, J K Rowling.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10bee/10bee50970fd40b76cea823277f12214cc58fcdd" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96be1/96be19557d7e455745decbc25aa94c947734482f" alt=""
Author Richard Klein analyses the origins of smoking in his book “Cigarettes Are Sublime” – in an attempt to quit his habit. Klein suggests cigarettes offer more than a whack of nicotine, but the very act of lighting up incites “a darkly beautiful, inevitably painful pleasure that arises from some intimation of eternity”.
If cancer-sticks supposedly offer so much relief to the typically tortured soul of the writer – what will happen if they are banned? Would the world be denied future masterpieces?
Then again Karl Stig-Erland Larsson of The Millennium Trilogy was a smoker and passed away before his fourth book was finished. So have we already been denied because of cigarettes?
I don’t like cigarettes.
In fact [book lover or not] I still think they should be banned.
No comments:
Post a Comment